Opinion: Is MEV Destroying Blockchain’s Promise of Fairness?

In January 2025, a trader lost almost $800,000 in what should have been a routine cryptocurrency transaction. This wasn’t due to a sophisticated hack or smart contract vulnerability. Instead, it represented something far more insidious – a fundamental flaw in how blockchain handles transaction privacy, which strikes at the heart of blockchain’s promise of fairness.

The trader, like thousands of other DeFi users, fell victim to a malicious MEV (Maximal Extractable Value) attack, in which a privileged actor manipulated transaction orders for personal gain. As someone who has spent the last few years championing blockchain’s potential to democratize finance, watching malicious MEV erode our founding principles feels like watching a friend betray their most sacred values.

Remember blockchain’s original promise?

Blockchain promised to fundamentally change finance by creating a truly open system. This would be a platform where code, not gatekeepers, enforced the rules and where everyone would have equal access to financial opportunities, regardless of their wealth or location.

It was technology designed to eliminate our dependence on banks and other powerful intermediaries, replacing them with transparent, automated systems that treated all participants equally.

But today, that vision is being corrupted by those who exploit their privileged positions in the ecosystem to extract value from ordinary users.

At the heart of this exploitation lies MEV – the ability to profit by controlling the ordering of transactions on the blockchain. What began as an academic curiosity has evolved into a systematic assault on blockchain’s foundational principles, costing users billions in extracted value.

To understand how this works, consider the mempool – the waiting room where transactions sit before being processed onto the blockchain. In theory, this transparency ensures fairness. In practice, it has become a hunting ground for sophisticated bots that scan for profitable opportunities.

These bots, operated by well-resourced players, perform front-running and “sandwich attacks” – inserting their own transactions before, and at times, also after a target trade to manipulate prices and extract profits from the unknowing targets.

The impact extends far beyond individual losses, too.

These practices create a “pay-to-play” environment where traders must either use specialized tools or accept that they’re likely to be front-run. Small traders suffer from worse prices, higher fees, and failed transactions, while those with advanced capabilities profit from this information asymmetry.

The industry’s response has been to create new intermediaries rather than fix the underlying problem.

Centralized MEV-blocking solutions and private transaction relays claim to protect users but actually concentrate power in new hands. These “solutions” fragment liquidity, increase costs, and often make the situation worse by creating multiple layers of extraction opportunities.

The reality is that such inaction can only be viewed as a tacit acceptance of the new norm.

Last year’s case of the Peraire-Buneo brothers highlighted the absurdity of the current situation. When the pair exploited a vulnerability in MEV-boost software to target MEV bots themselves, extracting $25 million in seconds, they were swiftly prosecuted. Yet the systematic extraction performed by “legitimate” MEV bots continues unabated, highlighting the industry’s confused priorities.

The tepid response to malicious MEV stems from a simple reality: too many powerful players profit from the status quo.

Major validators, block builders, and trading firms have built entire business models around MEV extraction. They argue that this represents efficient price discovery or necessary arbitrage, but this masks a fundamental truth: they’re profiting from information asymmetry at the expense of regular DeFi users.

The parallel to traditional finance is striking.

When high-frequency trading firms began exploiting their speed advantage in stock markets, the industry responded by creating dark pools and complex order types – solutions that added opacity while entrenching the advantages of privileged players.

Blockchain is now following the same destructive path.

The technical challenge isn’t insurmountable, but too many players have become comfortable with the status quo. They’ve forgotten that blockchain’s promise wasn’t just about creating new financial instruments but was about democratizing access to finance itself.

The technology to solve this exists today: encrypted mempools.

This cryptographic solution ensures that no one – not even block proposers or builders can see transaction details until they’re committed to a specific position in a block. It eliminates the information asymmetry that makes malicious MEV possible without compromising blockchain’s fundamental properties.

Unlike current “solutions” that merely shift trust to new intermediaries, encrypted mempools address the root cause by hiding transactions until they’re finalized while preserving decentralization. A few networks have already demonstrated their effectiveness, proving this isn’t just theoretical.

However, implementing this solution requires more than just technical capability. It demands a fundamental shift in how we think about blockchain’s future.

As traditional finance begins its inevitable migration onto blockchain networks, systematic MEV exploitation threatens to undermine the entire movement. No institution will entrust its assets to a system where front-running isn’t just possible—it’s abundant and highly profitable.

The blockchain industry stands at a crossroads.

We can continue down the current path, where insiders profit from structural advantages while claiming it’s just “market efficiency.” Or we can implement technical solutions that restore the level playing field blockchain promised.

The resistance to change is telling. Those profiting from the current system argue that MEV is inevitable or even beneficial. But there’s nothing beneficial about a system that forces users to either accept systematic exploitation or pay additional fees to intermediaries for protection.

Every day we delay addressing this issue, blockchain drifts further from its founding principles. Each extracted transaction, each front-run trade, and each sandwich attack represents another crack in the foundation of what we’re trying to build.

We have the ability to solve this today.

The only question is whether we have the will to challenge entrenched interests and implement solutions that benefit the many rather than the few.

The choice is ours.

To watch as blockchain recreates the very power structures it was meant to replace. Or we can take a stand and implement the changes needed to fulfill blockchain’s original promise.

History will judge us not just on the systems we built, but on whether those systems lived up to their promised ideals. For blockchain, that judgment may well hinge on how we handle the malicious MEV crisis.

Disclaimer: The opinions in this article are the writer’s own and do not necessarily represent the views of Cryptonews.com. This article is meant to provide a broad perspective on its topic and should not be taken as professional advice.

The post Opinion: Is MEV Destroying Blockchain’s Promise of Fairness? appeared first on Cryptonews.